Just a litte curious about spate of sudden bad reviews
Ok folks, we all have our opinions and I'm always glad to see reviews that help me to choose a product. I'm just a little curious about the sudden spate of negative reviews, though, on Tom's toothpaste; all pretty much recycling the same verbiage: "sodium laural sulfate is bad for you and causes canker sores" and "P&G is evil." I have to wonder how much of the product bashing is more about the latter than the former. I'm not going to say much more than that, other than to note that certain groups have targeted (continue to do so) P&G. If you have your differences with them, them say so in the appropriate forum(s), knock yourself out. But if you're using a "letter writing campaign" via negative product reviews, that's a little dishonest. I'm writing this review under toothpaste, but the same comments would apply to the Tom's deodorants and hand soaps that I purchase and use. I am especially prone to canker sores, regrettably. Sunburn, stress, any type of cold, etc. I keep a tube of abreva handy at the house and in my travel bag (not an endorsement, simply an observation). I have been using Tom's cinnamon toothpaste for nearly two years now. Not once has it caused a canker sore. On occasion, when traveling or simply because she is out of her normal "sensitive toothpaste" brand, my wife has used this toothpaste as well. I can assure you that she is very sensitive to any chemicals and never has she had a problem with this toothpaste (other than she's not crazy about the flavor I like). I have no affiliation with Toms of Maine, other than I purchase and use their products. And, to test my theory about these comments, I just purchased a competing toothpaste brand to see if I notice a difference. In conclusion, if you have differences of political or social opinions, please advocate openly and not through product reviews. If I find I like a competing product I like better, I'll update on that comparison. Fair enough? Thanks
Read More...