Hyaluronic acid shows significant scar improvementDual-Plane Treatment With Highly Concentrated Hybrid Cooperative Complexes of Hyaluronans for Facial Atrophic Acne Scars.
We explored the effectiveness of a high-concentration (4.5%) hyaluronic acid filler designed to treat facial acne scars. Participants received two treatments, and we evaluated improvements after four months.
Notably, patients experienced a 12% improvement in scar severity shortly after treatment and a significant 31% improvement after four months. The skin's depth measurement also showed a 20% reduction in acne scar deepness with no serious side effects reported.
These promising results suggest that this hyaluronic acid formulation could be a valuable option for individuals seeking to improve their acne scarring.
Read More
Promising treatment for acne scarsClinical evaluation of needle-free electronic pneumatic hyaluronic acid injection treatment for facial atrophic acne scars: A prospective, randomized comparative trial.
We examined how needle-free electronic pneumatic injections of hyaluronic acid could treat facial acne scars. In a carefully designed study, thirty Japanese participants received treatments on one side of their face, with follow-ups conducted for three months after completing three sessions.
Remarkably, 48.3% of the treated sides showed significant improvement, while none of the untreated sides did. Participants reported high satisfaction rates and the results were confirmed by imaging analysis. Overall, this treatment demonstrated promising effects on rolling acne scars with minimal side effects.
Read More
Hyaluronic acid shows scar improvementA combined subcision approach with either fractional CO laser (10,600 nm) or cross-linked hyaluronic acid versus subcision alone in atrophic post-acne scar treatment.
This study explored the effectiveness of using hyaluronic acid filler alongside subcision for treating post-acne scars.
In a controlled trial with 40 participants, we observed that both the subcision combined with hyaluronic acid and with fractional CO laser treatments showed significant improvements.
However, when comparing the two enhanced methods, neither was found to be statistically better than the other. Importantly, subcision alone still provided some improvement, even if modest. Overall, combining these treatments appears beneficial without serious side effects.
Read More
Subcision + HA shows improved resultsA combined approach of subcision with either cross-linked hyaluronic acid or threads in the treatment of atrophic acne scars.
We evaluated the impact of combining subcision with hyaluronic acid (HA) on atrophic acne scars. Forty patients received subcision treatments over three sessions, followed by either HA or threads on one side of the face, while the other side served as a control.
The results showed that after 6 months, 94.1% of patients in the HA group experienced significant improvement compared to 67.3% with subcision alone. Patient satisfaction was notably higher for those who received the combined treatment. Side effects were mild and temporary, making this combination a promising option for better scar management.
Read More
Hyaluronic acid fillers' comparative effectivenessComparison of 2 Hyaluronic Acid-based Fillers for the Treatment of Acne Scars: Structural Lifting Versus Biostimulatory Effect.
We evaluated how two types of hyaluronic acid fillers can impact acne scarring. In a well-structured study, thirty patients received injections of a new formulation with high and low molecular weight HA on one side of their face and a traditional HA filler on the other.
While the traditional filler showed quicker results, the new combined HA formulation provided more pronounced improvements over time. This suggests that hyaluronic acid treatments may offer varying benefits depending on the formulation used.
Read More